Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry

Favre, H. A., & Powell, W. H. (2013). Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry: IUPAC Recommendations and Preferred Names 2013.

Type

Book

Intellectual base

Review or monograph

Year

2013

DOI

10.1039/9781849733069

ISBN

9780854041824

DOI registrant

Royal Society of Chemistry

Link

https://iupac.org/what-we-do/books/bluebook/

Cited from

biology_ecology

Cited by

2 citations across 2 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Naming Convention
  • In chemical and pharmaceutical nomenclature, systematic names generate identifiers from molecular structure, and separate registry and nonproprietary-name systems impose distinct conventions for distinct purposes.

    This sourceDefines systematic rules generating chemical names from molecular structure, establishing the convention by which identifiers are derived rather than coined ad hoc.

    Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract

    The Blue Book's own abstract supplies only the chemical half: rules that derive systematic names from molecular structure; it says nothing about gene symbols, strain designations, registry or nonproprietary-name systems.

    “Nomenclature for chemical compounds additionally contains an explicit or implied relationship to the structure of the compound, in order that the reader or listener can deduce the structure from the name. This purpose requires a system of principles and rules, the application of which gives rise to a systematic nomenclature.”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Domain-specific

• Structural Formula
  • The Blue Book integrates graphical representation with systematic nomenclature and preferred names, showing that diagrams and names are coordinated but distinct modes of chemical specification.

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Links previously used in the corpus

Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.

• https://doi.org/10.1039/9781849733069 ×1

Registry ID ref:c9e921cf4be6 · see in the full table