Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation)¶
European Parliament, C. o. t. E. U. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, 1-88.
Retired. This is not a bibliographic entry. Our extractor captured an inline prose definition from an article and stored it as a work. The concept is real; this registry record is a parsing defect. This entry is kept so the citations that pointed at it still resolve, and so the correction is visible rather than silent.
Cited by¶
4 citations across 4 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Coercion Safeguard Review
- The standard it should hold to is freely given consent
This sourceRequires consent to be freely given and treats conditional access and the inability to consent separately as evidence against voluntariness.
- The standard it should hold to is freely given consent
- Consent and Privacy Boundary Checklist
- Consent Capture and Revocation Workflow
- Well-run consent regimes converge on the same requirements the GDPR codifies: that consent be freely given, specific, informed, and as easy to withdraw as it was to give.
This sourceDefines valid consent as freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous, and requires that withdrawing consent be as easy as giving it.
- Well-run consent regimes converge on the same requirements the GDPR codifies: that consent be freely given, specific, informed, and as easy to withdraw as it was to give.
- Proof-of-Completion Capture
- That is enough to deter phantom payments and prove receipt — but the program deliberately stops there, because building a rich biometric file on poor households for the sake of a five-dollar transfer would be a data-minimization
This sourceRequires personal data collection to be adequate, relevant, and limited to what is necessary for the stated purpose, disfavoring disproportionate biometric collection for a minor transaction.
- That is enough to deter phantom payments and prove receipt — but the program deliberately stops there, because building a rich biometric file on poor households for the sake of a five-dollar transfer would be a data-minimization
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 4 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 3 other ways.
- https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj ×2
- https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng ×1
- https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng/ ×1
Registry ID ref:ca7065ba07f0 · see in the full table