Beyond the HUD - User Interfaces for Increased Player Immersion in FPS Games¶
Fagerholt, E., & Lorentzon, M. (2009). Beyond the HUD - User Interfaces for Increased Player Immersion in FPS Games.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Diegesis
- Narratology — the home turf: fixes the story-world as a domain distinct from the telling, the author, and the audience, and indexes a critic's objection to the story-world or the artifact. Film theory — the most active arena for the diegetic/non-diegetic split, sorting score, voice-over, and on-screen sound by whether any character can access them, with different constraints on each. Literary criticism — analyses the world of a literary work and its nested story-within-a-story thresholds, reading a plot hole as a tear in diegetic continuity rather than a flaw of prose. Game studies — "diegetic UI" and "diegetic sound" are working categories distinguishing a floating health bar (non-diegetic) from a wound rendered on the character (diegetic)
This sourceThe diegetic / non-diegetic UI taxonomy used as a working category in game design.
- Narratology — the home turf: fixes the story-world as a domain distinct from the telling, the author, and the audience, and indexes a critic's objection to the story-world or the artifact. Film theory — the most active arena for the diegetic/non-diegetic split, sorting score, voice-over, and on-screen sound by whether any character can access them, with different constraints on each. Literary criticism — analyses the world of a literary work and its nested story-within-a-story thresholds, reading a plot hole as a tear in diegetic continuity rather than a flaw of prose. Game studies — "diegetic UI" and "diegetic sound" are working categories distinguishing a floating health bar (non-diegetic) from a wound rendered on the character (diegetic)
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:cc0be0ce13ef · see in the full table