Using Software in Qualitative Research¶
Lewins, A., & Silver, C. (2014). Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Analytic Memo
- Grounded theory — the canonical home, where the memo typology (code / theoretical / operational / integrative) and the memo-to-theory progression make the writing the analytic move in which categories are discovered. Ethnography — where memos sit alongside field notes to externalise the fieldworker's emerging interpretation and keep it auditable. Phenomenology — recording the reduction and the analyst's evolving reading of lived-experience accounts as an intermediate, revisable trace. Narrative inquiry — capturing candidate plot structures and thematic relations across collected stories before the final account. Action research — logging the reasoning behind iterative intervention-and-reflection cycles so decisions can be revisited and shared. CAQDAS-supported coding practice — NVivo, ATLAS.ti, and Dedoose ship explicit memo features
This sourceStep-by-step guide to using software in qualitative research, documenting the memo features of the packages it covers.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“Choose Code Memo. A memo for that code opens. Type the definition. Close the memo.”
- Grounded theory — the canonical home, where the memo typology (code / theoretical / operational / integrative) and the memo-to-theory progression make the writing the analytic move in which categories are discovered. Ethnography — where memos sit alongside field notes to externalise the fieldworker's emerging interpretation and keep it auditable. Phenomenology — recording the reduction and the analyst's evolving reading of lived-experience accounts as an intermediate, revisable trace. Narrative inquiry — capturing candidate plot structures and thematic relations across collected stories before the final account. Action research — logging the reasoning behind iterative intervention-and-reflection cycles so decisions can be revisited and shared. CAQDAS-supported coding practice — NVivo, ATLAS.ti, and Dedoose ship explicit memo features
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:ce0e38e1c067 · see in the full table