Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship¶
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. v. d. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- False Dilemma
- The same structural move recurs in architecture decisions ("monolith or microservices?" suppressing the modular monolith and the staged extraction) and in policy ("growth or environment?" suppressing Pareto-improving efficiency standards).
This sourceArgues the growth-versus-environment framing is a false trade-off, with well-designed regulation enabling Pareto-improving innovation offsets, supporting the policy false-dilemma example.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract backs only the policy half of the sentence: it calls the fixed environment-versus-competitiveness trade-off unnecessary and says well-crafted standards can trigger innovation offsets; it says nothing about architecture.
“Rather than simply adding to cost, properly crafted environmental standards can trigger innovation offsets, allowing companies to improve their resource productivity.”
- The same structural move recurs in architecture decisions ("monolith or microservices?" suppressing the modular monolith and the staged extraction) and in policy ("growth or environment?" suppressing Pareto-improving efficiency standards).
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:cf7625f76527 · see in the full table