Effects of Pay for Performance on the Quality of Primary Care in England¶
Campbell. (2009). Effects of Pay for Performance on the Quality of Primary Care in England. New England Journal of Medicine.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- McNamara fallacy
- . Education — standardized testing operating as the de facto curriculum, with civic, creative, and artistic dimensions that the test does not score progressively reclassified as "non-academic" and cut. Healthcare — process measures (e.g., the fraction of diabetics tested) substituting for outcome measures (actual morbidity), and pay-for-performance schemes optimizing the recorded measure rather than the patient
This sourceInterrupted time-series findings that incentivised aspects of primary care improved while aspects not linked to incentives declined for asthma and heart disease, and continuity of care fell after the English pay-for-performance scheme began.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“By 2007, the rate of improvement had slowed for all three conditions (P<0.001), and the quality of those aspects of care that were not associated with an incentive had declined for patients with asthma or heart disease.”
- . Education — standardized testing operating as the de facto curriculum, with civic, creative, and artistic dimensions that the test does not score progressively reclassified as "non-academic" and cut. Healthcare — process measures (e.g., the fraction of diabetics tested) substituting for outcome measures (actual morbidity), and pay-for-performance schemes optimizing the recorded measure rather than the patient
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:cf8da67920bc · see in the full table