We Screwed Up¶
Atlantic, T. E. o. T. (2013). We Screwed Up.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Native-advertising confusion
- The backlash was immediate — readers and critics objected that the editorial styling lent promotional content unearned credibility — and The Atlantic removed the post within a day, apologised, and later revised its sponsor-content guidelines
This sourceThe Atlantic editors' same-week note apologising for the sponsored Scientology post and conceding that the magazine's advertising policies had not kept pace; it carries the apology and the promise of a policy fix, not the substance of the criticism or the guidelines as eventually revised.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- The backlash was immediate — readers and critics objected that the editorial styling lent promotional content unearned credibility — and The Atlantic removed the post within a day, apologised, and later revised its sponsor-content guidelines
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:cf9217e94ee1 · see in the full table