Jazz Photo Corp. v. International Trade Commission, 264 F.3d 1094 (Fed. Cir. 2001)¶
(2001). Jazz Photo Corp. v. International Trade Commission, 264 F.3d 1094 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Doctrine of Repair and Reconstruction
- In Jazz Photo Corp. v. ITC (Federal Circuit 2001), reopening the shell of a used single-use camera, cleaning it, resetting the counter, installing new film and a battery, and resealing the package was permissible repair rather than reconstruction
This sourceSupplies Jazz Photo's holding that reopening a used single-use camera, cleaning it, resetting the counter, replacing film and battery, and resealing the package are permissible repair rather than reconstruction, together with its insistence on proof that each specimen descends from an authorized article; the full-back replacement step is carried by Fuji Photo, cited on the sentence that follows it.
- In Jazz Photo Corp. v. ITC (Federal Circuit 2001), reopening the shell of a used single-use camera, cleaning it, resetting the counter, installing new film and a battery, and resealing the package was permissible repair rather than reconstruction
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d113397c0a61 · see in the full table