Jazz Photo Corp. v. International Trade Commission¶
(2001). Jazz Photo Corp. v. International Trade Commission. F.3d.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Doctrine of Repair and Reconstruction
- In Jazz Photo Corp. v. ITC (Federal Circuit 2001), reopening the shell of a used single-use camera, cleaning it, resetting the counter, installing new film and a battery, and resealing the package was permissible repair rather than reconstruction
This sourceSupplies Jazz Photo's holding that reopening a used single-use camera, cleaning it, resetting the counter, replacing film and battery, and resealing the package are permissible repair rather than reconstruction, together with its insistence on proof that each specimen descends from an authorized article; the full-back replacement step is carried by Fuji Photo, cited on the sentence that follows it.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- In Jazz Photo Corp. v. ITC (Federal Circuit 2001), reopening the shell of a used single-use camera, cleaning it, resetting the counter, installing new film and a battery, and resealing the package was permissible repair rather than reconstruction
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d113397c0a61 · see in the full table