URS Corporation Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd¶
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. (2025). URS Corporation Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Remoteness in English law
- The UK Supreme Court in URS v BDW expressly distinguished purpose-based duty scope from remoteness in a professional-negligence claim grounded in an assumption of responsibility.
This sourceThe contract-style standard is scoped to negligence founded on contractual assumption of responsibility.
- The UK Supreme Court in URS v BDW expressly distinguished purpose-based duty scope from remoteness in a professional-negligence claim grounded in an assumption of responsibility.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d11870cef07a · see in the full table