Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem¶
Schrödinger, E. (1926). Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem. Annalen der Physik, 79, 361-376.
Cited by¶
5 citations across 5 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Discrete vs. Continuous (Quantization)
- The distinction between the bound-state vs scattering-state distinction is foundational: bound states have discrete energy eigenvalues; scattering states form a continuum.
This sourceFormulates quantization as an eigenvalue problem: solving the wave equation yields a discrete set of allowed energy eigenvalues for bound systems and a continuum for scattering states — directly supports the eigenvalue-spectrum / boundary-condition origin of discreteness, the bound-vs-scattering split, and the hydrogen energy levels.
- The distinction between the bound-state vs scattering-state distinction is foundational: bound states have discrete energy eigenvalues; scattering states form a continuum.
- Superposition
This sourceDerives the Schrödinger wave equation as the fundamental equation of quantum mechanics; treats matter as probability amplitudes propagating via a wave equation; unifies de Broglie waves with quantum mechanics.
- Wave
- Schrödinger's 1926 wave equation
This sourceDerives the Schrödinger wave equation as the fundamental equation of quantum mechanics; treats matter as probability amplitudes propagating via a wave equation; unifies de Broglie waves with quantum mechanics.
- Schrödinger's 1926 wave equation
- Wave-Particle Duality
Domain-specific¶
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 5 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d20d62d49503 · see in the full table