Propaganda¶
Ellul, J. (1965). Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Ad Nauseam (Argument from Repetition)
- Informal-logic fallacy catalogues — the home turf, where it sits among the Latin-named fallacies of relevance as the named charge that bare repetition has been offered in place of evidential warrant, audited by the evidence-per-repetition count. Propaganda studies — analyzes high-frequency repetition of a fixed message (Bernays, Ellul, Lippmann; the "big lie") as a defining feature of effective propaganda, frequency substituting at scale for independent corroboration
This sourceEllul's analysis of propaganda, which treats repetition as one principle among several - conditioning by duration rather than a counted frequency, with the maxim that the masses must be told a thing long enough to remember it.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“The famous principle of repetition, which is not in itself significant, plays a part only in this situation.”
- Informal-logic fallacy catalogues — the home turf, where it sits among the Latin-named fallacies of relevance as the named charge that bare repetition has been offered in place of evidential warrant, audited by the evidence-per-repetition count. Propaganda studies — analyzes high-frequency repetition of a fixed message (Bernays, Ellul, Lippmann; the "big lie") as a defining feature of effective propaganda, frequency substituting at scale for independent corroboration
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d244c93c16f1 · see in the full table