Speech Acts¶
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Commitment
- In speech-act theory and pragmatics, the commissive class — promise, vow, oath, undertaking — is exactly the class that creates commitments, and tracking each party's standing commitments is central to pragmatic inference.
This sourceDefines the commissive class of speech acts — promises and undertakings that commit the speaker to a future course of action.
- In speech-act theory and pragmatics, the commissive class — promise, vow, oath, undertaking — is exactly the class that creates commitments, and tracking each party's standing commitments is central to pragmatic inference.
- Performativity
- Searle (1969) systematized these conditions as constitutive rules of the form "X counts as Y in context C," making explicit that the act's force depends not on correspondence to facts but on satisfaction of background conventions.
This sourceSystematizes constitutive rules of the form "X counts as Y in context C," grounding illocutionary force in satisfaction of background conventions rather than correspondence to antecedent facts.
- Searle (1969) systematized these conditions as constitutive rules of the form "X counts as Y in context C," making explicit that the act's force depends not on correspondence to facts but on satisfaction of background conventions.
- Speech Act Theory (Illocution, Perlocution)
- John Searle's Speech Acts (1969) systematized the framework,
This sourceSystematizes constitutive rules of the form "X counts as Y in context C," grounding illocutionary force in satisfaction of background conventions rather than correspondence to antecedent facts.
- John Searle's Speech Acts (1969) systematized the framework,
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 3 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d3190f60d338 · see in the full table