Principles of Biomedical Ethics¶
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Cited by¶
5 citations across 5 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Agency
- And the criteria for capacity to consent — informed, voluntary, competent — follow directly from the triad's components (working belief-formation, working goal-setting, working action-selection), which is how law operationalizes them.
This sourceOperationalizes capacity to consent as informed, voluntary, and competent — the components mapping onto belief, goal, and action-selection.
- And the criteria for capacity to consent — informed, voluntary, competent — follow directly from the triad's components (working belief-formation, working goal-setting, working action-selection), which is how law operationalizes them.
- Autonomy
- In philosophy and ethics, self-legislation under universalizable principles, the right to direct one's own decisions in bioethics, and the operationalization of that right through informed consent all express the pattern at the level of the individual will.
This sourceEstablishes respect for autonomy as a core bioethical principle and develops informed consent as its operationalization over actions done to a patient. (Kantian self-legislation: Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, 1785.)
- In philosophy and ethics, self-legislation under universalizable principles, the right to direct one's own decisions in bioethics, and the operationalization of that right through informed consent all express the pattern at the level of the individual will.
- Side Effect
- Surgical informed consent transferred into clinical-research ethics and onward into behavioral-research, AI-deployment, and data-governance ethics.
This sourceCanonical framework for informed consent and research ethics whose disclosure norms extended into behavioral, AI-deployment, and data-governance ethics.
- Surgical informed consent transferred into clinical-research ethics and onward into behavioral-research, AI-deployment, and data-governance ethics.
- Sovereignty
- Liberal political theory treats bodily autonomy as a fundamental human right, preceding and constraining state authority, a position Beauchamp and Childress (2019) systematize as the principle of respect for autonomy at the foundation of contemporary biomedical ethics.
This sourceCanonical "four principles" framework for biomedical ethics—respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice—centering patient sovereignty/autonomy as foundational to clinical and research ethics, including informed consent and end-of-life decision-making.
- Liberal political theory treats bodily autonomy as a fundamental human right, preceding and constraining state authority, a position Beauchamp and Childress (2019) systematize as the principle of respect for autonomy at the foundation of contemporary biomedical ethics.
- Virtue Ethics
- This contrasts with principlism (Beauchamp-Childress 2019: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice as abstract principles applied to cases).
This sourceCanonical "four principles" framework for biomedical ethics—respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice—centering patient sovereignty/autonomy as foundational to clinical and research ethics, including informed consent and end-of-life decision-making.
- This contrasts with principlism (Beauchamp-Childress 2019: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice as abstract principles applied to cases).
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 5 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:d42577aef011 · see in the full table