Returns to buying winners and selling losers¶
JEGADEESH, N., & TITMAN, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65-91.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)
- Event study of earnings announcements and the post-earnings-announcement drift (PEAD) anomaly: Drawing on the methodology Jegadeesh and Titman (1993) deployed in their landmark momentum study, researchers compute abnormal returns as actual return minus risk-model predicted return (e.g., Fama-French 3-factor expected return) over an event window of [−1, 0, +1] trading days centered on the quarterly earnings release.
This sourceDocuments 3–12 month momentum profits surviving risk adjustment — supports marker 219 (the methodology referenced in the PEAD event-study example and a persistent semi-strong-EMH challenge).
- Event study of earnings announcements and the post-earnings-announcement drift (PEAD) anomaly: Drawing on the methodology Jegadeesh and Titman (1993) deployed in their landmark momentum study, researchers compute abnormal returns as actual return minus risk-model predicted return (e.g., Fama-French 3-factor expected return) over an event window of [−1, 0, +1] trading days centered on the quarterly earnings release.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d42f41710d33 · see in the full table