Broken Promises of Privacy¶
Ohm, P. (2010). Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization. UCLA Law Review.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Retaliation and Re-identification Audit
- It then models re-identification paths — in a six-person seminar, a single free-text comment plus a demographic detail can point straight at one student, and evaluations released before grades are finalized let an instructor act on them.
This sourceNominally anonymized records can often be re-identified by linking them with auxiliary information.
- It then models re-identification paths — in a six-person seminar, a single free-text comment plus a demographic detail can point straight at one student, and evaluations released before grades are finalized let an instructor act on them.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d4437a681942 · see in the full table