Organizational ambidexterity

Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375-409.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2008

Volume

34

Issue

3

Pages

375-409

DOI

10.1177/0149206308316058

DOI registrant

SAGE Publications

Link

https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058

Cited from

biology_ecology, futurism_foresight, organizational_management, systems_cybernetics

Cited by

8 citations across 8 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Absorptive Capacity

  • This sourceReview synthesizing literature streams into a model of the antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of organizational ambidexterity.

• Adaptation
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
• Adaptive Capacity
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
• Ambidexterity (Exploit vs. Explore)
  • Ambidextrous reasoning proceeds by asking

    This sourceComprehensive review consolidating the antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of ambidexterity and the architectures (structural, contextual, sequential/leadership-based) that support simultaneous exploitation and exploration.

    Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract

    Reviews ambidexterity's antecedents, moderators and outcomes and defines it as simultaneous alignment and adaptivity, but the abstract names no architecture supporting both modes.

    “Organizational ambidexterity, defined as an organization's ability to be aligned and efficient in its management of today's business demands while simultaneously being adaptive to changes in the environment, has gained increasing interest in recent years.”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

• Diversity
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
• System Slack
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
• Three Horizons Analysis
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
• Variation Strategies
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 8 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:d4443fae9ab0 · see in the full table