Economy and Society

Weber, M. (1922). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press.

Type

Book

Intellectual base

Review or monograph

Year

1922

ISBN

9780520028241

Link

https://archive.org/details/economysociety0000webe

Cited from

computer_science, earth_sciences, history_historiography, law_governance, mathematics, organizational_management, philosophy, political_science, sociology_anthropology

Cited by

14 citations across 14 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Abstract Data Type
  • Software engineering — the origin: behavioural specification of components, information-hiding as the design discipline, and modern interfaces, protocols, and abstract base classes as the implementing mechanisms. Legal and political systems — the office-versus-officer distinction: an office is specified by powers and duties while the incumbent is interchangeable, and succession is the substitution of an occupant behind a stable contract.

    This sourceStates the rational-legal distinction between an office — defined by impersonal powers and duties, with obedience owed to the impersonal legal order — and its interchangeable office-holder, the basis for succession as substitution of an occupant behind a stable role, with eligibility/appointment as the conformance condition.

• Adjudication (Dispute Resolution)
  • … is legitimate because bound by rule and exposed to scrutiny, not because invisible and unaccountable—the rational-legal mode of domination Weber (1922) distinguished from charismatic and traditional authority precisely by its rule-bound, reason-giving character backed by the state's monopoly on legitimate force.

    This sourceDistinguishes rational-legal, traditional, and charismatic legitimate domination and ties modern adjudication to rule-bound rational-legal authority backed by the state's monopoly on legitimate force — supports the legitimacy-via-reasoning archetype (D49-013).

• Authority
  • Legitimate power to make binding decisions or assertions, distinct from coercive force or persuasive influence, as Weber (1922) classically formulated in his account of Herrschaft (legitimate domination).

    This sourceFoundational sociological theory: distinguishes legitimate domination (Herrschaft) from raw power, and develops the rational-legal, traditional, and charismatic modes of legitimate authority, each resting on a distinct ground of recognized legitimacy.

• Comparative Method
  • The signature appears wherever a researcher studies social, historical, or institutional phenomena at a scale too large for controlled experimentation: comparative politics, comparative-historical sociology, cross-cultural anthropology, comparative literature, comparative law.

    This sourceWeber's comparative civilizational analysis of bureaucratic forms, religion, and capitalist development, organized through ideal-types built by comparative abstraction — cited as a foundational instance of the comparative method across fields. (Citation-fix: the prior annotation described rational-legal authority / monopoly on violence, which is not what this marker's claim asserts; the marker sits on a broad enumeration of comparative disciplines, for which Weber is an exemplar rather than a specific source.)

• Delegation of Authority
  • The accountability relationship and reporting obligation (metrics, reviews, audit mechanisms, remediation pathways)

    This sourceDistinguishes rational-legal, traditional, and charismatic legitimate domination and ties modern bureaucracy to rule-bound, record-keeping rational-legal authority; supports the accountability/reporting-obligation element (005) as the foundational account of rule-bound authority structures.

• Formalization
  • Organizational theory: Turning informal routines into documented procedures, policies, and org charts — Weber's (1922) analysis of bureaucratic rationalization treats this codification of office, rule, and jurisdiction as the engine that lets large organizations operate impersonally and at scale.

    This sourceAnalyzes bureaucratic rationalization: rational-legal authority rests on codified office, rule, and jurisdiction, the codification that lets large organizations operate impersonally and at scale.

• Great Man Theory
  • Scholarship on charismatic authority (Weber) and leadership measurement (Bass) have attempted to codify traits of successful leaders, but the countervailing population of equally charismatic or visionary individuals who failed because their structural conditions did not permit success remains largely invisible in the historical record.

    This sourceDistinguishes rational-legal, traditional, and charismatic types of legitimate domination; the analysis of charismatic authority anchors the prime's appeal to charismatic-leadership scholarship.

• Hierarchy
  • T2 — Imposed vs Emergent Hierarchy. Weber's bureaucratic hierarchy

    This sourceFoundational sociological theory: distinguishes rational-legal, traditional, and charismatic modes of legitimate domination, and ties modern adjudication to rule-bound rational-legal authority backed by the state's monopoly on legitimate violence.

• Legitimacy
  • - Political science and governance (core domain): Max Weber's typology of legitimate authority (traditional, charismatic, legal-rational) as foundation; modern political science on state legitimacy; comparative studies of regime legitimacy and instability.

    This sourceFoundational sociological theory: distinguishes rational-legal, traditional, and charismatic modes of legitimate domination, and ties modern adjudication to rule-bound rational-legal authority backed by the state's monopoly on legitimate violence.

• No One Is Above the Rules
  • In technology contexts, the principle applies to both code and conduct, instantiating what Weber (1922) characterized as the defining mark of legal-rational authority: the strict separation between the office and the office-holder, so that obligations attach to roles rather than persons.

    This sourceFoundational sociological theory: distinguishes rational-legal, traditional, and charismatic modes of legitimate domination, and ties modern adjudication to rule-bound rational-legal authority backed by the state's monopoly on legitimate violence.

• Stratification
  • Sociology and political economy.

    This sourceFoundational sociological theory: distinguishes rational-legal, traditional, and charismatic modes of legitimate domination, and ties modern adjudication to rule-bound rational-legal authority backed by the state's monopoly on legitimate violence.

Domain-specific

• Iron law of oligarchy
  • Political parties — the canonical case (Michels on the German SPD): socialist, labour, green, and populist parties professionalizing leadership, suppressing factional challenge, and diverging from the base. Trade unions — officers professionalizing and developing institutional-preservation interests that resist membership-driven democratization. Religious reform movements — founded charismatic movements institutionalizing into hierarchies with professional clergy distinct from the laity (Weber's routinization of charisma running parallel)

    Supported in partVerified against the source

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

• Methodological individualism
  • Methodological individualism is the explanatory principle that social phenomena should be derived from individual-level action and interaction rather than irreducible group-level agency.

Mechanisms

• Charter or Mandate Document
  • A charter is most honest when it names which of Weber's classic bases of legitimate authority it actually rests on.

    This sourceDistinguishes Weber's legal-rational, traditional, and charismatic bases of legitimate authority.

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's ISBN resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 14 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Links previously used in the corpus

Before the registry existed this work was also linked 5 other ways.

• https://www.google.com/books/edition/Economy_and_Society/MILOksrhgrYC ×2
• https://www.ucpress.edu/books/economy-and-society/paper ×2
• https://archive.org/details/economysociety00webe ×1
• https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/124933 ×1
• https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520035003/economy-and-society ×1

Registry ID ref:d49a56ef12ba · see in the full table