Skip to content

Knowledge Hiding in Organizations.

Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2012). Knowledge Hiding in Organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1), 64-88.

Type
Journal article
Intellectual base
Primary research
Year
2012
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
64-88
DOI
10.1002/job.737
DOI registrant
Wiley
Link
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.737
Cited from
political_science

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

  • Manufactured Dependency for Role Capture
    • Indispensable-expert hoarding — a specialist withholds documentation and training so no replacement can emerge; the role depends on exclusivity.

      This sourceDefines and investigates intentional knowledge hiding, including hoarding driven by a desire to preserve indispensability and competitive advantage.

      Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract

      The abstract establishes intentional knowledge hiding as a construct distinct from hoarding and predicted by distrust, but never mentions withheld documentation or training, blocked replacements, or indispensability-based exclusivity.

      “We establish that knowledge hiding exists, we distinguish knowledge hiding from related concepts (knowledge hoarding and knowledge sharing), and we develop a multidimensional measure of this construct. ... Each of these hiding behaviors is predicted by distrust, yet each also has a different set of interpersonal and organizational predictors.”

      From the publisher's abstract.

      Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:d511e519998d · see in the full table