Dual-task interference in simple tasks¶
Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220-244.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Attentional Capacity
- The shared move is treating attention as a finite resource whose allocation explains performance limits, an analytic strategy Pashler (1994) consolidates in his review of dual-task interference as evidence for a central capacity bottleneck.
This sourceInfluential review consolidating dual-task interference and psychological-refractory-period evidence for a central capacity bottleneck in attentional selection
- The shared move is treating attention as a finite resource whose allocation explains performance limits, an analytic strategy Pashler (1994) consolidates in his review of dual-task interference as evidence for a central capacity bottleneck.
- Refractory Period
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d56fdaff85fd · see in the full table