Maintenance, Replacement, and Reliability¶
Jardine, A. K. S., & Tsang, A. H. C. (2013). Maintenance, Replacement, and Reliability: Theory and Applications. CRC Press.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Maintenance
- The distinction matters: repair is reactive and often expensive; maintenance is proactive and typically cheaper, as Jardine and Tsang (2013) develop in their canonical decision-analytic framework for maintenance and replacement.
This sourceDecision-analytic framework distinguishing preventive maintenance (proactive, cheaper) from corrective repair (reactive, expensive); develops mathematical models for optimal intervention timing.
- The distinction matters: repair is reactive and often expensive; maintenance is proactive and typically cheaper, as Jardine and Tsang (2013) develop in their canonical decision-analytic framework for maintenance and replacement.
- Temporal Decay and Degradation
- Recognizing the pattern lets organizations bundle preventive maintenance, warranty cycles, capital planning, knowledge transfer, and lifecycle refresh into coherent strategies rather than ad hoc, crisis-driven repairs—the integrated portfolio approach Jardine and Tsang (2013) develop for maintenance, replacement, and reliability decisions.
This sourceDecision-analytic framework distinguishing preventive maintenance (proactive, cheaper) from corrective repair (reactive, expensive); develops mathematical models for optimal intervention timing.
- Recognizing the pattern lets organizations bundle preventive maintenance, warranty cycles, capital planning, knowledge transfer, and lifecycle refresh into coherent strategies rather than ad hoc, crisis-driven repairs—the integrated portfolio approach Jardine and Tsang (2013) develop for maintenance, replacement, and reliability decisions.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d57c55b25f4d · see in the full table