API Lifecycle Management¶
API Lifecycle Management: Deprecation and Sunsetting.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Pruning
- The software parallel maps role-for-role with the prime's reversibility-staging move: a codebase accretes features (over-build), usage telemetry serves as the use-signal, and removal is staged as deprecate-then-delete — soft-remove first, audit usage over a window, hard-delete only if truly unused — precisely because pruning is harder to reverse than addition.
This sourceDescribe the deprecate-then-delete API lifecycle: announce deprecation, keep the endpoint live while monitoring usage telemetry, then hard-delete (sunset) once usage is gone — soft-then-hard staged removal.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Supports a two-stage deprecate-then-sunset API lifecycle; it says nothing about usage telemetry, an audit window, hard-delete only if unused, or why removal is harder to reverse.
“Deprecation means that the API is no longer recommended for use, even though it is still operational.”
- The software parallel maps role-for-role with the prime's reversibility-staging move: a codebase accretes features (over-build), usage telemetry serves as the use-signal, and removal is staged as deprecate-then-delete — soft-remove first, audit usage over a window, hard-delete only if truly unused — precisely because pruning is harder to reverse than addition.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:d5a98a30c765 · see in the full table