Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce¶
Peirce, C. S. (. (1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press.
Cited by¶
4 citations across 4 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Icon–Index–Symbol Distinction
- Charles S. Peirce's trichotomy classifies signs by the ground of their relation to what they signify.
This sourceFoundational semiotic theory: the triadic sign relation (representamen / object / interpretant) separates the referential content from the vehicle carrying it, supporting the prime's distinction between representation and modality.
- Charles S. Peirce's trichotomy classifies signs by the ground of their relation to what they signify.
- Metaphor (Visual/Artistic)
- A common failure is conflating the two, missing how metaphorical grounding differs from arbitrary symbolism, a separation Peirce (1931–1958) systematizes in his typology of icon, index, and symbol.
This sourceFoundational semiotic theory: the triadic sign relation (representamen / object / interpretant) separates the referential content from the vehicle carrying it, supporting the prime's distinction between representation and modality.
- A common failure is conflating the two, missing how metaphorical grounding differs from arbitrary symbolism, a separation Peirce (1931–1958) systematizes in his typology of icon, index, and symbol.
- Representational Modality
- The referential truth is the same across modalities; the cognitive and behavioral consequences differ sharply, a separation that tracks Peirce's (1931–1958) sign/representamen/object distinction in which the same object can be carried by signs of vastly different vehicular character.
This sourceFoundational semiotic theory: the triadic sign relation (representamen / object / interpretant) separates the referential content from the vehicle carrying it, supporting the prime's distinction between representation and modality.
- The referential truth is the same across modalities; the cognitive and behavioral consequences differ sharply, a separation that tracks Peirce's (1931–1958) sign/representamen/object distinction in which the same object can be carried by signs of vastly different vehicular character.
- Signifier–Signified Duality
- Not the Peircean triadic sign. Peirce (1931–1966) Collected Papers defined the sign as a triad: representamen (the sign itself), object (the external thing), interpretant (the sign's meaning in an interpreter's mind).
This sourceFoundational semiotic theory: the triadic sign relation (representamen / object / interpretant) separates the referential content from the vehicle carrying it, supporting the prime's distinction between representation and modality.
- Not the Peircean triadic sign. Peirce (1931–1966) Collected Papers defined the sign as a triad: representamen (the sign itself), object (the external thing), interpretant (the sign's meaning in an interpreter's mind).
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 4 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d5b2017b6b6a · see in the full table