A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities¶
Evetts, J. (2011). A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities. Current Sociology.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Professionalization
- Evetts's distinction between occupational and organizational professionalism warns that the same language can support different control structures: collegial discretion and occupational authority in one case, managerial standardization and performance control in another
This sourceEvetts's account of professionalism as an occupational value being reworked inside large organizations, and of the consequences for who controls the priorities and processes of the work; her occupational-versus-organizational contrast — collegial authority and discretion against standardized procedure, target-setting and performance review — is set out across this and her companion papers of the same period.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Evetts's distinction between occupational and organizational professionalism warns that the same language can support different control structures: collegial discretion and occupational authority in one case, managerial standardization and performance control in another
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d64eb63f4ff0 · see in the full table