Volcanic versus anthropogenic carbon dioxide¶
Gerlach, T. (2011). Volcanic versus anthropogenic carbon dioxide. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Biogeochemical Cycling
- Fourth, anthropogenic fluxes in some cycles now exceed natural fluxes by large factors: current fossil-fuel combustion delivers carbon to the atmosphere at roughly a hundred times the natural volcanic flux — Gerlach's comparison puts global volcanic emissions near 0.26 gigatonnes of CO₂ a year against roughly 35 gigatonnes of CO₂ from human activity — saturating some sinks and accumulating in others in ways the pre-industrial cycle did not experience
This sourceWhat follows about sink saturation is not from this source.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Fourth, anthropogenic fluxes in some cycles now exceed natural fluxes by large factors: current fossil-fuel combustion delivers carbon to the atmosphere at roughly a hundred times the natural volcanic flux — Gerlach's comparison puts global volcanic emissions near 0.26 gigatonnes of CO₂ a year against roughly 35 gigatonnes of CO₂ from human activity — saturating some sinks and accumulating in others in ways the pre-industrial cycle did not experience
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d725a00e1e6c · see in the full table