What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean¶
Kratzer, A. (1977). What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Modality (Semantics)
- Which possibilities matter, and whether the reading is strong or weak, must be established for the language and utterance being studied.
This sourceOriginal full text; supports the relative modal core and contextual background analysis for English. https://semantics.uchicago.edu/kennedy/classes/s08/semantics2/kratzer77.pdf
- Which possibilities matter, and whether the reading is strong or weak, must be established for the language and utterance being studied.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d73e59be3273 · see in the full table