The Problem of Pseudoreplication in Neuroscientific Studies¶
Lazic, S. E. (2010). The Problem of Pseudoreplication in Neuroscientific Studies: Is It Affecting Your Analysis?. BMC Neuroscience.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Live-Cell Imaging
- A defensible analysis distinguishes frame, track, field, well, culture, and biological replicate, then assigns inference at the level generated by the design.
This sourceDirect experimental-design guidance on identifying the experimental unit and avoiding pseudoreplication from correlated subsamples or repeated observations.
- A defensible analysis distinguishes frame, track, field, well, culture, and biological replicate, then assigns inference at the level generated by the design.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d74d98993314 · see in the full table