Prolegomena to an Apology for Pragmaticism¶
Peirce, C. S. (1906). Prolegomena to an Apology for Pragmaticism. Monist, 16(4), 492-546.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Type–Token Distinction
- Six, or five, and the question has no answer until it is settled which of two things is being counted: the numerically distinct inscriptions that occur in that line, or the repeatable vocabulary items they are inscriptions of, since "the" occurs twice.
This sourceIntroduces the Type/Token terminology out of the counting question about a page carrying some twenty occurrences of the one English word 'the'.
- Six, or five, and the question has no answer until it is settled which of two things is being counted: the numerically distinct inscriptions that occur in that line, or the repeatable vocabulary items they are inscriptions of, since "the" occurs twice.
Domain-specific¶
- Item (Copy)
- Beyond cultural-heritage modeling the honest reading is case (B): underneath the FRBR Item lies the substrate-independent type/token distinction (Peirce 1906)
This sourceGives Peirce's Type/Token distinction - a definitely significant Form is a Type, a Token being a single object or event, and a Token of a Type an Instance of the Type.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“Such a definitely significant Form, I propose to term a Type.”
- Beyond cultural-heritage modeling the honest reading is case (B): underneath the FRBR Item lies the substrate-independent type/token distinction (Peirce 1906)
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d793a5f99d7b · see in the full table