Continuous Integration (Original Version)¶
Fowler, M., & Foemmel, M. (2000). Continuous Integration (Original Version). martinfowler.com.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Integration Review
- Frequent reviews keep drift small and cheap to fix but tax the streams; rare ones batch integration risk into a dangerous late crunch.
This sourceExplains that frequent integration keeps conflicts small and quickly diagnosable, while deferred integration accumulates risk into a painful late crunch.
- Frequent reviews keep drift small and cheap to fix but tax the streams; rare ones batch integration risk into a dangerous late crunch.
- Integration Test Suite
- The classic misuse is validating each branch in isolation and skipping the combined run, the anti-pattern the continuous-integration tradition names "integration hell"
This sourceExplains that whole-system automated tests and frequent integration expose interaction failures quickly, while deferred integration accumulates difficult conflicts and produces “integration hell.”
- The classic misuse is validating each branch in isolation and skipping the combined run, the anti-pattern the continuous-integration tradition names "integration hell"
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d7b3059d5ea7 · see in the full table