The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance¶
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Formative Assessment
- The Black-Wiliam research program, the CAST universal-design-for-learning framework, and a substantial body of subsequent research consistently identify formative assessment as one of the highest-leverage instructional practices available, with effect sizes that rival or exceed more complex interventions; Kluger and DeNisi's (1996) meta-analysis in Psychological Bulletin showed an average feedback-intervention effect of d ≈ 0.4 across 131 studies, while also documenting that roughly one-third of feedback interventions actually depressed performance — establishing that the structural conditions under which feedback is delivered (task-focused versus self-focused, actionable versus evaluative) determine whether the leverage is realized.
This sourceMeta-analysis (607 effect sizes from 23,663 observations) finding average feedback-intervention effect d=.41 while over one-third of interventions DECREASED performance; clarifies conditions under which feedback helps vs. harms.
- The Black-Wiliam research program, the CAST universal-design-for-learning framework, and a substantial body of subsequent research consistently identify formative assessment as one of the highest-leverage instructional practices available, with effect sizes that rival or exceed more complex interventions; Kluger and DeNisi's (1996) meta-analysis in Psychological Bulletin showed an average feedback-intervention effect of d ≈ 0.4 across 131 studies, while also documenting that roughly one-third of feedback interventions actually depressed performance — establishing that the structural conditions under which feedback is delivered (task-focused versus self-focused, actionable versus evaluative) determine whether the leverage is realized.
Domain-specific¶
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d958bf781c54 · see in the full table