Our current understanding of mutualism¶
Bronstein, J. L. (1994). Our current understanding of mutualism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 69(1), 31-51.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Dependency
- The relation has been formalized independently in five distinct intellectual traditions: graph-theoretic dependency analysis in compiler design (Aho, Lam, Sethi, and Ullman 2006), task-precedence modeling in operations research (Kelley and Walker 1959, who introduced the Critical Path Method), logical entailment in formal logic (Tarski 1936), semantic presupposition in philosophy of language (Strawson 1950), and obligate dependency in ecology (Janzen 1980).
This sourceReview of mutualism that characterizes obligate mutualism as a tightly coupled bidirectional dependency with cascading failure modes — the obligate-dependency-in-ecology tradition cited in marker 212 (replaces janzen-1980, which defines coevolution, not dependency).
- The relation has been formalized independently in five distinct intellectual traditions: graph-theoretic dependency analysis in compiler design (Aho, Lam, Sethi, and Ullman 2006), task-precedence modeling in operations research (Kelley and Walker 1959, who introduced the Critical Path Method), logical entailment in formal logic (Tarski 1936), semantic presupposition in philosophy of language (Strawson 1950), and obligate dependency in ecology (Janzen 1980).
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:d95fb9d5cdfc · see in the full table