Communications Act of 1934, Section 202¶
Congress, U. S. (1934). Communications Act of 1934, Section 202: Discriminations and Preferences.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Common Carriage Obligation
- The discipline is to judge by the effect on like users rather than the label, and to pair the rate duty with a non-degradable quality floor.
This sourceBars direct or indirect unjust discrimination or undue preference for like communication service and pairs common-carrier service obligations with just-and-reasonable charge and practice duties.
- The discipline is to judge by the effect on like users rather than the label, and to pair the rate duty with a non-degradable quality floor.
- Platform Access Rule
- The classic misuse is writing access criteria to exclude a competitor's complementors while claiming neutral standards — an echo of the common-carrier non-discrimination principle read in reverse
This sourceProhibits common carriers from imposing unjust or unreasonable discrimination, preferences, or disadvantages in like communications service.
- The classic misuse is writing access criteria to exclude a competitor's complementors while claiming neutral standards — an echo of the common-carrier non-discrimination principle read in reverse
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:da46bd1d7836 · see in the full table