Reading Law

Scalia, A., & Garner, B. A. (2012). Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts.

Type

Web resource

Intellectual base

Web

Year

2012

Link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reading_Law:_The_Interpretation_of_Legal_Texts

Cited from

linguistics_semiotics, literature_literary_theory

Cited by

2 citations across 2 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Close Reading
  • Legal interpretation: textualist statutory and constitutional interpretation, contract construction, and treaty analysis, where reading every word as load-bearing — down to the placement of a comma — is close reading applied to legal artefacts.

    This sourceTextualist canon treating every word — down to punctuation — of statutes and constitutions as load-bearing.

• Pragmatics
  • Law. Statutory interpretation supplements text with legislative purpose, surrounding sections, and customary usage; contracts are read against course-of-dealing.

    This sourceTreats statutory interpretation as supplementing text with context, surrounding provisions, purpose, and customary usage.

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Links previously used in the corpus

Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.

• https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en.html ×1

Registry ID ref:dae10c7bad5d · see in the full table