Reading Law¶
Scalia, A., & Garner, B. A. (2012). Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Close Reading
- Legal interpretation: textualist statutory and constitutional interpretation, contract construction, and treaty analysis, where reading every word as load-bearing — down to the placement of a comma — is close reading applied to legal artefacts.
This sourceTextualist canon treating every word — down to punctuation — of statutes and constitutions as load-bearing.
- Legal interpretation: textualist statutory and constitutional interpretation, contract construction, and treaty analysis, where reading every word as load-bearing — down to the placement of a comma — is close reading applied to legal artefacts.
- Pragmatics
- Law. Statutory interpretation supplements text with legislative purpose, surrounding sections, and customary usage; contracts are read against course-of-dealing.
This sourceTreats statutory interpretation as supplementing text with context, surrounding provisions, purpose, and customary usage.
- Law. Statutory interpretation supplements text with legislative purpose, surrounding sections, and customary usage; contracts are read against course-of-dealing.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:dae10c7bad5d · see in the full table