Looking Together ≠ Seeing the Same Thing¶
Popov, V., Chen, X., Wang, J., Kemp, M., Sandhu, G., Kantor, T., Mateju, N., et al. (2024). Looking Together ≠ Seeing the Same Thing: Understanding Surgeons' Visual Needs During Intra-operative Coordination and Instruction. Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Joint Attention
- Pedagogy's attention-monitoring techniques transferred into operating-room training.
This sourceField study of surgical teams showing that joint attention on the operative target must be actively established and is distinct from merely co-viewing — transfers attention-monitoring/gaze techniques into operating-room coordination and instruction.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
The paper situates surgical gaze guidance within gaze-sharing work in learning contexts and suggests gaze overlays for OR instruction, but it is a needs study and does not state that pedagogy's techniques were transferred.
“there has been significant interest in both the HCI and surgical education communities to explore gaze-based guidance and training techniques.”
- Pedagogy's attention-monitoring techniques transferred into operating-room training.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:db1c8c0e93a1 · see in the full table