Getting to yes¶
Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes. integrative.
Retired. This work is a duplicate of another record that has itself been withdrawn: the two citations are the same source, and that source was withdrawn because “This is not a bibliographic entry. Our extractor captured an inline prose definition from an article and stored it as a work. The concept is real; this registry record is a parsing defect” The record is kept so links to it still resolve. This entry is kept so the citations that pointed at it still resolve, and so the correction is visible rather than silent.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Zero-Sum Framing Challenge
- It reframes "who wins?" into "is this even the right kind of game?"
This sourceA framing challenge is the check that decides which of the two a situation actually calls for.
- It reframes "who wins?" into "is this even the right kind of game?"
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:db66902086d1 · see in the full table