Crime and Punishment¶
Dostoevsky, F. (1866). Crime and Punishment.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Domain-specific¶
- Dialogism
- In Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics he argues that a Dostoevsky novel is not a single authorial consciousness ventriloquizing its characters but a genuine polyphony, in which fully weighted, incompatible worldviews — Raskolnikov's rationalized transgression, Sonya's faith, Porfiry's ironic probing in Crime and Punishment
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“The crime of Raskolnikov is not so much repented of as it is regarded as being canceled by voluntary submission to Siberian exile.”
- In Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics he argues that a Dostoevsky novel is not a single authorial consciousness ventriloquizing its characters but a genuine polyphony, in which fully weighted, incompatible worldviews — Raskolnikov's rationalized transgression, Sonya's faith, Porfiry's ironic probing in Crime and Punishment
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:db9ce1fcb59a · see in the full table