Skip to content

Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans

Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797-811.

Type
Journal article
Intellectual base
Primary research
Year
1995
Volume
69
Issue
5
Pages
797-811
DOI registrant
American Psychological Association
Link
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797matched
Cited from
psychology

Cited by

2 citations across 2 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

Domain-specific

  • Stereotype Threat
    • Foundational work by Steele and Aronson (1995) demonstrated the mechanism in African American students on standardized verbal tests;

      This sourceDefines and experimentally demonstrates stereotype threat as a downstream performance effect on the stereotyped target, distinct from the stereotyping mechanism in the perceiver.

      SupportedVerified against the publisher's abstract

      The 1995 abstract reports that Black participants underperformed on a difficult verbal test under ability-diagnostic conditions, supporting the cited demonstration of stereotype threat.

      “Studies 1 and 2 varied the stereotype vulnerability of Black participants taking a difficult verbal test by varying whether or not their performance was ostensibly diagnostic of ability, and thus, whether or not they were at risk of fulfilling the racial stereotype about their intellectual ability.”

      From the publisher's abstract.

      Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:dc58d0737dfe · see in the full table