Learning New Words¶
Storkel. (2001). Learning New Words.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Phonotactics
- Phonological theory — phonotactic constraints as the surface signature of syllable templates, sonority sequencing, and the OCP, and as evidence about the architecture of phonological grammar. Speech-language pathology — phonotactic probability and neighbourhood density as predictors of word-learning ease and as targets in vocabulary intervention
This sourceAn experimental study of 3- to 6-year-olds showing that nonwords built from common, high-phonotactic-probability sound sequences were learned more rapidly than rare-sequence nonwords across form and referent learning.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“Results indicated that common sound sequences were learned more rapidly than rare sound sequences across form and referent learning.”
- Phonological theory — phonotactic constraints as the surface signature of syllable templates, sonority sequencing, and the OCP, and as evidence about the architecture of phonological grammar. Speech-language pathology — phonotactic probability and neighbourhood density as predictors of word-learning ease and as targets in vocabulary intervention
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:dca374a13bb7 · see in the full table