A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory¶
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751-783.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Cultural Friction
- Backlash implies active rejection of the new in defense of the old; friction produces heterogeneous outcomes—some rejection, some adoption, some creative hybrid forms—the heterogeneity Pettigrew and Tropp (2006) document meta-analytically in their synthesis of intergroup contact research, where contact under appropriate conditions yields integration rather than uniform rejection.
This sourceMeta-analysis of 515 studies establishing that intergroup contact under appropriate conditions reliably reduces prejudice, yielding heterogeneous (often integrative) rather than uniformly rejecting outcomes—the heterogeneity the marker cites.
- Backlash implies active rejection of the new in defense of the old; friction produces heterogeneous outcomes—some rejection, some adoption, some creative hybrid forms—the heterogeneity Pettigrew and Tropp (2006) document meta-analytically in their synthesis of intergroup contact research, where contact under appropriate conditions yields integration rather than uniform rejection.
- In-Group / Out-Group
- A manager familiar with the superordinate-category result in social psychology can apply it directly to a siloed organization, because the structural problem, two in-groups treating each other as out-groups, is identical.
This sourceMeta-analysis of more than 500 studies establishing that intergroup contact under appropriate conditions reliably reduces prejudice; empirical anchor for SIT-derived recategorization, dual-identity, and superordinate-identity interventions.
- A manager familiar with the superordinate-category result in social psychology can apply it directly to a siloed organization, because the structural problem, two in-groups treating each other as out-groups, is identical.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:dcb590773aea · see in the full table