The Confrontation Between General Relativity and Experiment.¶
Will, C. M. (2014). The Confrontation Between General Relativity and Experiment. Living Reviews in Relativity, 17(4), 1-117.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Equivalence Principle
- Mapped back: This applied example demonstrates
This sourceComprehensive review of equivalence-principle tests (WEP/EEP/SEP) and the universal coupling of gravity to energy-momentum.
- Mapped back: This applied example demonstrates
- Frame of Reference
- The tension between operational definitions (e.g., gyroscopes and atomic clocks as privileged-frame markers ) and theoretical definitions (e.g., inertial frames in the limit at infinity) has been systematically addressed through quantitative formulations of Mach's principle and modern tests of frame-relative gravity
This sourceGravity Probe B) and related precision measurements.
- The tension between operational definitions (e.g., gyroscopes and atomic clocks as privileged-frame markers ) and theoretical definitions (e.g., inertial frames in the limit at infinity) has been systematically addressed through quantitative formulations of Mach's principle and modern tests of frame-relative gravity
- Inertia
- Modern tests (Will 2014)
This sourceComprehensive modern review of equivalence-principle tests; weak equivalence principle (test masses fall identically in external gravitational field), Einstein equivalence principle (metric tensor is the only gravity field), strong equivalence principle (entire gravitational interaction couples universally); tests to unprecedented precision; modern experimental status of inertial-mass-gravitational-mass equivalence.
- Modern tests (Will 2014)
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:de45bad008d0 · see in the full table