Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking¶
Varpio. (2016). Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Medical Education.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Theme Reification
- Market and UX research — the canonical case: analyst-built thematic groupings ("users have three needs: control, clarity, confidence") hardening into roadmap-driving "user needs" presented as empirical findings. Clinical and health interview research — themes constructed from patient-interview corpora (e.g. oncology) treated as discovered properties of the patient population rather than the analyst's summaries
This sourceThe critique of thematic emergence in health professions education research, which argues that the term is used without reflection on its origins, definitions and implications.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
“In this paper, we share our critical reflections on four qualitative terms popularly used in the HPE literature: thematic emergence; triangulation; saturation, and member checking.”
- Market and UX research — the canonical case: analyst-built thematic groupings ("users have three needs: control, clarity, confidence") hardening into roadmap-driving "user needs" presented as empirical findings. Clinical and health interview research — themes constructed from patient-interview corpora (e.g. oncology) treated as discovered properties of the patient population rather than the analyst's summaries
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:dea38ddec97a · see in the full table