Atomic transactions¶
Lampson, B. W. (1981). Atomic transactions. Distributed Systems: Architecture and Implementation, 105, 246-265.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Sovereignty
- This hybrid model gives Samsung code sovereignty over their device customizations while Google retains sovereignty over core Google services—an instance of what Lampson (1981) characterized in distributed-systems terms as the "owner of state" pattern, where authority over a code or data partition is exclusive to whichever party holds the write-key for that partition.
This sourceClassic distributed-systems treatment of "owner of state" and atomic transaction patterns: in a reliable distributed system, authority over each piece of state must be vested in a designated owner or in an explicit replication-and-quorum protocol.
- This hybrid model gives Samsung code sovereignty over their device customizations while Google retains sovereignty over core Google services—an instance of what Lampson (1981) characterized in distributed-systems terms as the "owner of state" pattern, where authority over a code or data partition is exclusive to whichever party holds the write-key for that partition.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:df88a6d7c4b1 · see in the full table