Why the Constitution Matters¶
Tushnet, M. (2010). Why the Constitution Matters. Yale University Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Checks and Balances
- Checks and balances designed to prevent one-actor dominance may also prevent adaptive change, as Tushnet (2010) emphasizes in arguing that constitutional change is driven primarily by political action rather than judicial doctrine.
This sourceArgues that constitutional change is driven primarily by political mobilization and party realignment rather than by judicial doctrine; foregrounds the tension between constitutional rigidity and adaptive reinterpretation.
- Checks and balances designed to prevent one-actor dominance may also prevent adaptive change, as Tushnet (2010) emphasizes in arguing that constitutional change is driven primarily by political action rather than judicial doctrine.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:e294513ece02 · see in the full table