Why the Constitution Matters¶
Tushnet, M. (2010). Why the Constitution Matters. Yale University Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Checks and Balances
- Checks and balances designed to prevent one-actor dominance may also prevent adaptive change, as Tushnet (2010) emphasizes in arguing that constitutional change is driven primarily by political action rather than judicial doctrine.
This sourceArgues that constitutional change is driven primarily by political mobilization and party realignment rather than by judicial doctrine; foregrounds the tension between constitutional rigidity and adaptive reinterpretation.
- Checks and balances designed to prevent one-actor dominance may also prevent adaptive change, as Tushnet (2010) emphasizes in arguing that constitutional change is driven primarily by political action rather than judicial doctrine.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:e294513ece02 · see in the full table