Digital constitutionalism¶
Suzor, N. (2018). Digital constitutionalism: Using the rule of law to evaluate the legitimacy of governance by platforms. Social Media + Society, 4(3), 1-11.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Rule of Law
- Suzor (2018) documents how platform-governance scholarship has converged on reflexive binding of the platform by its own published rules as the diagnostic that separates rule-of-law from rule-by-policy in digital governance contexts.
This sourceDocuments convergence in platform-governance scholarship on reflexive binding of platforms by their own published rules as the criterion distinguishing rule-of-law from rule-by-policy.
- Suzor (2018) documents how platform-governance scholarship has converged on reflexive binding of the platform by its own published rules as the diagnostic that separates rule-of-law from rule-by-policy in digital governance contexts.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:e3cdcd697c69 · see in the full table