Digital constitutionalism¶
Suzor, N. (2018). Digital constitutionalism: Using the rule of law to evaluate the legitimacy of governance by platforms. Social Media + Society, 4(3), 1-11.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Rule of Law
- Suzor (2018) documents how platform-governance scholarship has converged on reflexive binding of the platform by its own published rules as the diagnostic that separates rule-of-law from rule-by-policy in digital governance contexts.
This sourceDocuments convergence in platform-governance scholarship on reflexive binding of platforms by their own published rules as the criterion distinguishing rule-of-law from rule-by-policy.
- Suzor (2018) documents how platform-governance scholarship has converged on reflexive binding of the platform by its own published rules as the diagnostic that separates rule-of-law from rule-by-policy in digital governance contexts.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:e3cdcd697c69 · see in the full table