Tipping the Scales¶
Lindsay, J. R. (2015). Tipping the Scales: The Attribution Problem and the Feasibility of Deterrence Against Cyberattack. Journal of Cybersecurity, 1(1), 53-67.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Coercion
- The criminological finding that perceived probability dominates severity transfers directly to cybersecurity (broadcasting attribution capability shifts attacker behavior more than escalating declared penalties)
This sourceFormal model of cyber deterrence showing how attribution (raising the attacker's perceived probability of identification and retaliation) governs the feasibility of deterrence — the certainty-over-severity logic in a cyber substrate.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Lindsay's model shows attribution raising the probability of punishment and making cyber deterrence feasible; it does not test certainty against severity or cite criminology.
“All other things being equal, attribution raises the probability of punishment”
- The criminological finding that perceived probability dominates severity transfers directly to cybersecurity (broadcasting attribution capability shifts attacker behavior more than escalating declared penalties)
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:e4052dfcacce · see in the full table