Rhetorical Listening¶
Ratcliffe. (2005). Rhetorical Listening: Identification, Gender, Whiteness. SIU Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Rhetorical Listening
- Rhetorical listening, as theorized by Krista Ratcliffe in Rhetorical Listening: Identification, Gender, Whiteness (2005), with antecedents in Carl Rogers's work on empathic listening and Wayne Booth's rhetoric of assent, is a discursive stance that deliberately suspends the move to rebuttal and instead parses another's discourse for its positional structure — what the speaker is naming as their stakes, what differences remain genuinely unresolved, and what positional investments the speaker (and the listener) carry on the topic
This sourceRatcliffe's account of rhetorical listening as identification theory - Burke's identification, Fuss's identification and disidentification, and nonidentification - worked through eavesdropping, metonymic and pedagogical approaches. Ratcliffe's situating of rhetorical listening within cross-cultural conduct, theorising the intersections of gender and whiteness. Ratcliffe's development of rhetorical listening for cross-cultural communication through the analysis of whiteness as an invisible racial category.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“Rhetorical Listening: Identification, Gender, Whiteness argues that rhetorical listening facilitates conscious identifications needed for cross-cultural communication.”
- Rhetorical listening, as theorized by Krista Ratcliffe in Rhetorical Listening: Identification, Gender, Whiteness (2005), with antecedents in Carl Rogers's work on empathic listening and Wayne Booth's rhetoric of assent, is a discursive stance that deliberately suspends the move to rebuttal and instead parses another's discourse for its positional structure — what the speaker is naming as their stakes, what differences remain genuinely unresolved, and what positional investments the speaker (and the listener) carry on the topic
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:e40bb7a8e053 · see in the full table