Brown v. Board of Education¶
(1954). Brown v. Board of Education.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- No One Is Above the Rules
- … is to clarify that equality before the law is not identity of treatment but absence of arbitrary disadvantage, a reading the U.S. Supreme Court endorsed in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) when it held that nominally "equal" segregated facilities were constitutionally unequal under the Fourteenth Amendment.
This sourceUnanimous U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that state-mandated racial segregation in public schools violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment; canonical articulation that nominal procedural equality cannot justify substantively unequal treatment.
- … is to clarify that equality before the law is not identity of treatment but absence of arbitrary disadvantage, a reading the U.S. Supreme Court endorsed in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) when it held that nominally "equal" segregated facilities were constitutionally unequal under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:e49cf1f24353 · see in the full table