NIPA Handbook¶
US Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2023). NIPA Handbook: Concepts and Methods of the U.S. National Income and Product Accounts.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Circular Flow
- In practice the source data never match to the dollar, so agencies such as the US Bureau of Economic Analysis report the gap explicitly as a "statistical discrepancy" line
This sourceThe BEA's own statement that the discrepancy arises from 'differences in data sources, timing, and estimation techniques' against a conceptual identity — note that the published US gap is between the expenditure measure (GDP) and the income measure (GDI), the value-added route being conceptual rather than a third published aggregate.
SupportedVerified against the source
- In practice the source data never match to the dollar, so agencies such as the US Bureau of Economic Analysis report the gap explicitly as a "statistical discrepancy" line
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:e6bdf7da2cf6 · see in the full table