The emotional dog and its rational tail¶
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814-834.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Belief Formation
- Naming all five roles is what lets a post-mortem distinguish the part of the verdict that tracked evidence from the part driven by conformity and motivation — a kind of post-hoc rationalization Haidt (2001) documented in his social-intuitionist model of moral judgment where the verdict precedes and steers the justification.
This sourceSocial-intuitionist model in which a moral judgment (formed belief) precedes and steers post-hoc justification.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Haidt's abstract states moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction generated after a judgment is reached — it backs the post-hoc-rationalization clause only, not the 'five roles' mechanism.
“the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached.”
- Naming all five roles is what lets a post-mortem distinguish the part of the verdict that tracked evidence from the part driven by conformity and motivation — a kind of post-hoc rationalization Haidt (2001) documented in his social-intuitionist model of moral judgment where the verdict precedes and steers the justification.
- Emotional Reasoning
- The juror then selectively attends to evidence consistent with guilt and discounts or reinterprets evidence of innocence.
This sourceDevelops the social intuitionist model in which moral judgment (a formed belief) precedes and steers post-hoc rational justification; the verdict is fixed first, the reasoning follows.
- The juror then selectively attends to evidence consistent with guilt and discounts or reinterprets evidence of innocence.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:e6ee4eb547ca · see in the full table