Self-Interest, Automaticity, and the Psychology of Conflict of Interest¶
Moore, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Self-Interest, Automaticity, and the Psychology of Conflict of Interest. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 189-202.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Conflict of Interest
- Moore and Loewenstein (2004) emphasize that self-interested judgment operates automatically and unconsciously, so even sincere actors will systematically discount diffuse harms while attending to concentrated personal gains.
This sourceArgues self-interest is automatic and largely unconscious while obligation to others requires deliberate effort, so conflicts produce systematic bias even among sincere actors — supports the automatic-self-interest claim. Live-verified (Springer).
- Moore and Loewenstein (2004) emphasize that self-interested judgment operates automatically and unconsciously, so even sincere actors will systematically discount diffuse harms while attending to concentrated personal gains.
- Motivated Reasoning
- Institutional settings with explicit epistemic duties are its most legible hosts, precisely because they write down the standard the asymmetry then departs from.
This sourceArgues that self-interest bends professional judgement automatically and outside awareness wherever a role carrying an explicit duty also leaves the judgement discretionary.
- Institutional settings with explicit epistemic duties are its most legible hosts, precisely because they write down the standard the asymmetry then departs from.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:e7c25ff8e9a3 · see in the full table