Domain Size and Domain-Size Distributions¶
Leoni, M. (2019). Domain Size and Domain-Size Distributions. International Tables for Crystallography, Volume H: Powder Diffraction.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Scherrer Equation
- The equation becomes weak when strain broadening is appreciable, peaks overlap, size distributions are broad, morphology is anisotropic but (K) is held fixed, preferred orientation impairs profile estimation, defects make line shapes reflection-specific, or the instrument profile is poorly characterized
This sourceThe reference-work treatment of domain size and size distributions, setting out why a size estimate that fixes shape and ignores the size distribution is superseded by whole-pattern microstructure modelling.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- The equation becomes weak when strain broadening is appreciable, peaks overlap, size distributions are broad, morphology is anisotropic but (K) is held fixed, preferred orientation impairs profile estimation, defects make line shapes reflection-specific, or the instrument profile is poorly characterized
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:e86a19eab660 · see in the full table